Skip to main content

Congressional Inquiry 2

The 2nd hearing on the Tadeco-Bucor Joint Venture Agreement last May 30, 2017 was nothing but grandstanding, with no new issues to boot, just the bully Alvarez and bobo Aguirre. Alvarez, in his porma - rocking his chair, forgot that he is part of the legislative body and not the executive. His commands to the DOJ presumed that he is in the executive part of our government. Aguirre, on his part being with the executive department, felt helpless with the commands of a person not his superior because of fear on the issues hounding him which can cost him his post. It is, therefore, a show of their weaknesses. One, assuming to be an executive and the other succumbing to an assuming congressman, all in the guise of righting a wrong. Is it right for a congressman, being a member of the legislative body, to command a member of the executive department? Is it ok for a member of the executive department to just say yes to the whims of somebody in the legislative department? And can the two of them just decide on a case which is in the field of the judiciary? I still remember that the executive, legislative and judicial bodies are supposed to be independent of each other. I think they forgot this. As seen, Alvarez would like to scrap the deal immediately because if it will be pushed through the justice system, his line of reasoning will not stand a chance. But just as exciting as the twists and turns in koreanovelas, his evil plans put a lot of pressure on him, that from a mere investigation on the agreement and ill-treatment of workers in aid of legislation, it became a personal crusade to obliterate Tadeco using the resources of the state and the positions of weaker people all in the guise of national interest. National interest, my ass.
I remember the two things Lee Kuan Yew said before, on issues thrown at him, purpose and stake of the perpetrator. What is the purpose of Alvarez in throwing his weight on the Tadeco-Bucor JVA? What is his stake on it?
His purpose, apparently, is to punish the Floirendos because of the spat between his girlfriend and that of Tonyboy, not considering that by doing so, he would be hard-pressed in proving his claim and unknowingly put an effective rehabilitation system and livelihood of thousands of workers in jeopardy. His stake is supposed to be showing that he is preventing the republic from bleeding funds. For what? To propel himself to stardom which will eventually put him to the senate in the next election? or to seal a rumored business dealing which involves banana plantations?
His purpose and stake on the issue is personal and has nothing to do with his love for the country, if ever he does have it. This is a modern world with informed people who can see through the drama and ka-echusan.

Comments

  1. Play Casino City - Bonuses, Promotions, and more!
    Casino City Bonuses 토토 사이트 추천 and Promotions · Betfair – 사이트 추천 Great site for 바카라 사이트 casino players · PartyCasino 1xbet – Excellent betting options for slots · Big Bad Reels 바카라 – Many

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What arrogance can do!!!

Tadeco was attacked yesterday morning (9/26/2019) by the governor of Davao del Norte. Coming in with heavy equipments (Boom truck, grader, buckhoe, acetylene welding, etc) worthy of demolishing huge structures accompanied by firetrucks in anticipation of breaking the ranks of peaceful workers defending their livelihood, he held his head high up expecting success.  His purpose : bring down structures he and his cohorts (before being elected as governor) have long wished to conquer because it's their promise to people with hatred to Tadeco.  Concern #1: As claimed by the Gov, he had serve a one-month notice for Tadeco to dismantle illegal obstruction in Tadeco farm roads claimed as public roads.  Fact is, there was indeed a letter informing Tadeco that the govt will dismantle structures dated Sept 16 and received by Tadeco on Sept 20. Is this a one-month notice?  And a letter dated Sept 24, postponing the activity to Oct 7 which...

Tadeco - Bucor Joint Venture Agrement - Laws and Proclamations

Legality of the Tadeco-Bucor Joint Venture Agreement Law: Commonweath Act 141 of 1936. Chapter II. SECTION 8 . Only those lands shall be declared open to disposition or concession which have been officially delimited and classified and, when practicable, surveyed, and which have not been reserved for public or quasi-public uses, nor appropriated by the Government, nor in any manner become private property, nor those on which a private right authorized and recognized by this Act or any other valid law may be claimed, or which, having been reserved or appropriated, have ceased to be so. However, the President may, for reasons of public interest, declare lands of the public domain open to disposition before the same have had their boundaries established or been surveyed, or may, for the same reason, suspend their concession or disposition until they are again declared open to concession or disposition by proclamation duly published or by Act of the National Assembly. Fact: ...